Establishing Trusty Mutual-Belief among Cooperative Agents
نویسنده
چکیده
Believing mutually is one important premise to ensure that cooperation among multiple agents goes smoothly. However, mutual belief among agents is always considered for granted. In this paper, we adapt a method based on the position-exchange principle (PEP) to reason about mutual belief among agents before cooperation starts. By reasoning about mutual belief among agents, we can judge whether cooperation among agents can go on rationally or not. On the other hand, if there are malicious agents involved in cooperation, even though agents believe mutually while cooperating, the profit of honesty agents will be injured. Especially in the e-commerce environment, it is crucial to establish a fair exchanging circumstance over the Internet, in which malicious agents should be forbidden from transactions. To establish trusty mutual-belief and make cooperation useful, agents should be able to reason about cheating behaviours of malicious agents during cooperation. In this paper, we put forward a process algebra approach by extending the standard pi-calculus to model cooperation plans and agents. For an agent, we define a new kind of pro-activity, expectations, to describe what action the agent expect to occur and how much the agent is satisfied with the action’s occurrence. By extending the standard pi-calculus, we can specify the expectations of agents and reason about the satisfaction degrees of agents during the their evolutions. To reason about mutual belief formally, we bind the position-exchange principle into the inference rules defined on process expressions; whereas to reason about cheating behaviours among agents during cooperation, we define a group of criteria for anti-cheating. In this paper, we also give some examples to show how agents can be formally defined in the process algebra, how agents build mutual-belief by using the PEP inference rules, and how agents reason about cheating by referring to their anti-cheating criteria during commercial transactions.
منابع مشابه
Reasoning about Mutual-belief among Multiple Cooperative Agents
Believing mutually is an important premise to ensure that cooperation among multiple agents goes smoothly. However, mutual belief among agents is always considered for granted. In this paper, we adapt a method based on the position-exchange principle to reason about mutual belief among agents. To reason about mutual belief formally, we first use a process algebra approach, the pi-calculus, to f...
متن کاملYoung People in Old Cars - Challenges for Cooperative Design
30 years after the birth of the Scandinavian tradition for system design, a new generation of researchers, are struggling to adapt and reinforce the methodology of cooperative design. We practice user participation in order to improve democracy at work and quality of products, mutual learning in the design process and ‘designing by doing’ in order to promote communication and learning in the de...
متن کاملBelief Systems for Conflict Resolution
In a multiagent system, conflicts may arise because of two basic reasons: 1) different agents have contrasting goals; 2) different agents have inconsistent knowledge. This situation can originate when agents are autonomous and strongly motivated by their own interests, and when heterogeneous agents, with different skills, ‘histories’ and beliefs, coexist in a dynamic environment. This paper is ...
متن کاملCreating Common Beliefs in Rescue Situations
In some rescue or emergency situations, agents may act individually or on the basis of minimal coordination, while in others, fullfledged teamwork provides the only means for the rescue action to succeed. In such dynamic and often unpredictable situations agents’ awareness about their involvement becomes, on the one hand, crucial, but one can expect that it is only beliefs that can be obtained ...
متن کاملA Novel Self-Adaptive Bayesian Belief Network with Information Entropy for Leveraging Decision Consensus among Multi-Agents
Decision making in a semistructured or unstructured problem should consist of a combination of solution procedures, probabilistic reasoning, and human judgments. Such processes mostly involve in evaluating multi-objectives or attributes while making decisions. In addition, they are always complied with the decision makers’ inward probabilistic structure, which will be tedious without the assist...
متن کامل